Explore the ScaleUp Annual Review 2020
Select a section to expand and explore this year's review..
CONTENTS
Introduction 2020
Chapter 1 2020
The Scaleup business landscape
Chapter 2 2020
Leading Programmes Breaking Down the Barriers for Scaleups
Chapter 3 2020
The local scaleup ecosystem
Chapter 4 2020
Shaping policy to foster UK scaleups: Breaking down barriers
Chapter 5 2020
Looking Forward
Scaleup Stories 2020
Annexes 2020
2018 Recommendations: Progress
Strong Progress | Progress | Further Progress Needed | Significant Progress Needed
Evidence Gap | ||
1 |
A verification process with Government should be created to allow for local and national stakeholders to verify the ‘Scaleup status’ of a business, building on the recent work of the ScaleUp Institute with Government. This should tap into datasets that combine ONS, Companies House and HMRC data points to enable stakeholders to fast track solutions to scaleup leaders. If necessary, legislation should be passed to introduce such an enquiry capability. | |
Talent and Skills | ||
2 |
A ‘Scaleup Visa’ should be made available in communities where there are 100+ scaleup companies to enable scaleup leaders, across all sectors, to recruit the staff they need to increase their capacity to grow. The Government should make the international skills needs of scaling businesses a priority. Local authorities, education establishments, advisory and finance companies should be able to be sponsors of such. | |
3 |
The Department for Education, Local Enterprise Partnerships and the Careers & Enterprise Company should use their convening and promotional power to ensure that students at schools, colleges and universities come into contact with business leaders and that APIs to the National Pupils database and the destinations database (with suitable protections) are made available so that the impact of these interventions can be measured. The public, private and education sector should continue to work together to close the gap on provision of high-quality flexible scaleup leadership programmes, including mentoring, peer networks and matchmaking of non-executive directors who have scaled businesses before. Better connections should also continue to be made between national programmes and local ecosystem leaders. The Small Business Charter, and other such mechanisms, should integrate an assessment of ‘scaleup engagement’ into their performance analysis. | |
Leadership Gap | ||
4 |
Funding for local communities should continue to be tied to the eff ective deployment of initiatives that close the scaleup gap as well as the results and impacts that they have on the number of scaleup businesses in their area. Every local Industrial Strategy should have a scaleup pillar, including a markets access strategy and a scaleup cluster map based on currently available datasets. | |
5 |
All local communities should appoint a Scaleup Champion and develop a relationship management structure for scaleup businesses. | |
6 |
The outcomes of the Productivity Review, Shared Prosperity Fund and Comprehensive Spending Review should ensure that funding for impactful business support (whether it be mentors, leadership or networks) has a significant focus and segmentation towards our scaleup businesses, which are generators of wealth, exports and productivity to the UK economy. These Reviews should collectively ensure no gap in scaleup support provision is allowed to arise in light of the UK’s changing relationship with the EU. | |
Access to Markets | ||
7 |
Central Government when implementing its Export Strategy should allocate a significant portion of resources to scaleups, including supporting dedicated trade missions for scaleups. All local areas should be encouraged to set up a local exchange programme for scaling businesses, such as that developed by the Mayoral ‘Go to Grow’ campaign in London. | |
8 |
Public bodies should use the inaugural Visible Scaleup Public Procurement Index to further improve their understanding and reporting on the procurement involving UK scaleups, including scaling businesses not yet visible at Companies House.
All public bodies should improve the way opportunities are promoted to scaleup companies by significantly raising the visibility of procurement champions and ensuring their roles have objectives and measurements. The Government should continue the evolution of Contracts Finder to become a smart platform and continue to develop more scaleup specific ‘meet the buyer’ events working with local areas and build on the current work underway as regards sandbox environments. |
|
9 |
Large companies should report on the level of collaboration and procurement they source from scaleup companies. Any procurement contracts with Government should require an increase in the amount of business undertaken with scaleups as part of the contracting process which should be monitored. | |
Finance Gap | ||
10 |
Government and industry should ensure progress is made closing the finance gap for scaleup by continuing the work to implement the Patient Capital Review. Growth finance should be included as core curriculum in all local scaleup leadership programmes, enabling them to seek out and secure the most appropriate funding at each stage of their company’s growth. The status of current EU sources of funding needs to be monitored, and replaced as appropriate. |
Page URL: https://www.scaleupinstitute.org.uk/articles/2018-recommendations-progress/
CONTENTS
Introduction 2020
Chapter 1 2020
The Scaleup business landscape
Chapter 2 2020
Leading Programmes Breaking Down the Barriers for Scaleups
Chapter 3 2020
The local scaleup ecosystem
Chapter 4 2020
Shaping policy to foster UK scaleups: Breaking down barriers
Chapter 5 2020
Looking Forward
Scaleup Stories 2020
Annexes 2020
Share